A reassessment of stress-induced "analgesia" in the rat using an unbiased method.

Abstract

An increased tail-flick latency to noxious heat during or after stress in the rodent is usually interpreted as a stress-induced reduction in pain sensitivity and often described as a form of stress-induced "analgesia." However, this measure is an indirect and flawed measure of the change in nociceptive threshold to noxious heat. A major confound of the latency measure is the initial temperature of the tail, which can drop down to room temperature during stress, the consequence of a marked sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction in the skin of the extremities. We addressed this issue with tail-flick tests during contextual fear using infrared thermography to monitor temperature changes and a CO2 laser to deliver the heat stimulus. The experiment revealed a 4.2°C increase of the nociceptive threshold, confirming a true antinociceptive effect. However, its contribution to the increased withdrawal latency was less than two-thirds (63.2%). Nearly one-third (32.2%) was due to the drop in tail temperature (4.4°C), which also slowed conduction along sensory fibers (2.2%, included in the 32.2%). The remaining 4.6% was due to an increase in decisional/motor latency. This new unbiased method establishes beyond doubt that a conditioned stress response is associated with true antinociception to noxious heat. It also confirms that stress-induced changes in skin temperature can be a major confound in tail-flick tests. The present study shows, for the first time, the exact contribution of these two components of the tail-flick latency for a stress response. Less than two-thirds of the increase in tail-flick latency to noxious heat, evoked by conditioned fear, reflects true antinociception. The remaining is due to skin vasoconstriction.