Determining whether a patient is feeling better: pitfalls from the science of human perception.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21336670.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s11606-011-1655-3 and PMC identifier 3138972.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Human perception is fallible and may lead patients to be inaccurate when judging whether their symptoms are improving with treatment. This article provides a narrative review of studies in psychology that describe misconceptions related to a patient's comprehension, recall, evaluation and expression. The specific misconceptions include the power of suggestion (placebo effects), desire for peace-of-mind (cognitive dissonance reduction), inconsistent standards (loss aversion), a flawed sense of time (duration neglect), limited perception (measurement error), declining sensitivity (Weber's law), an eagerness to please (social desirability bias), and subtle affirmation (personal control). An awareness of specific pitfalls might help clinicians avoid some mistakes when providing follow-up and interpreting changes in patient symptoms.
Medical subject headings
- Emotions
- Mental Recall
- Patient Participation
- Perception
- Physician-Patient Relations