Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for preoperative imaging of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: advantages and disadvantages compared with computed tomography angiography: a United Kingdom perspective.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21407061.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181fab9ea.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The anatomy of the anterior abdominal wall is highly variable and leads to uncertainty when harvesting a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. Presurgical imaging has been shown to reduce the operating time, as well as reduce the rates of flap and donor site complications. The importance of imaging of the venous system has also been recognized for reducing the risk of venous congestion. The modalities currently available for presurgical imaging include handheld Doppler ultrasound, duplex ultrasound, computed tomographic angiography (CTA), and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA). Of these, the most promising are CTA and CE-MRA, and advantages and disadvantages exist for both modalities. In this article, we review the use of CE-MRA for preoperative flap imaging and report our experience with its use in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap harvest, as well as compare it with CTA. We also explore the future directions for presurgical flap imaging.
Medical subject headings
- Abdominal Wall
- Contrast Media
- Epigastric Arteries
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography
- Preoperative Period
- Surgical Flaps