Radiological changes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage and plate construct: the significance of the anterior spur formation sign.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21508883.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821c3cbf.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Retrospective review. To analyze the changes of fusion process and radiological parameters during the postoperative period after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage and plate construct (ACDF-CPC). Because of its well-reported efficacy, plate augmentation has been performed to avoid the various complications associated with the cage-alone procedure. The radiological changes at the fusion site after ACDF-CPC have yet to be fully explored. Seventy-eight patients (122 fusion sites) who underwent ACDF-CPC were observed at 6 weeks and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Fusion status was classified into 3 categories: Type I (pseudoarthrosis), Type II (borderline), and Type III (fusion). Changes at the fusion site were described through radiological parameters at each follow-up time point. In addition, the ability of the radiological parameters to predict fusion rates was analyzed. The fusion process after ACDF-CPC progresses slower when compared with the standard procedure utilizing autograft. Fusion between bone graft chips begins at 6 weeks post surgery. At 3 months, initial bone bridging between graft and host bones begins to form. Anterior spur formation occurs at 3 to 6 months, and "kissing" lesions form at 6 to 12 months. Bony incorporation is achieved at 1 to 2 years. Persistent or newly developed Type I at the 1-year follow-up exhibited significantly higher pseudoarthrosis rates in comparison with rates determined at the 3- and 6-month time points. Among 29 subsidence cases, 9 of the 16 (56.3%) cases that exhibited anterior spur formation eventually achieved fusion, whereas 2 of the 13 (15.4%) cases that did not exhibit anterior spur formation eventually achieved fusion. In cases that demonstrated anterior spur formation, the fusion rate was significantly higher than in cases without it (P = 0.016). The fusion process after ACDF-CPC progresses slower than the standard procedure utilizing autograft. Cage subsidence of greater than 2 mm, a radiolucent defect, or a halo sign are poor prognostic signs indicating a high probability for pseudoarthrosis when detected radiographically after 1 year postoperatively. The anterior spur formation sign and "kissing" lesion, on the contrary, represent signs for eventual successful fusion.
Medical subject headings
- Cervical Vertebrae
- Diskectomy
- Intervertebral Disc
- Osseointegration
- Spinal Fusion
Anatomy
- cervical spine