Optimal margins and lymphadenectomy in colonic cancer surgery.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21560120.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/bjs.7518.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A standard management policy has not yet been established with respect to the extent of lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer. A total of 914 consecutive patients who underwent potentially curative surgery for T2-T4 colonic cancer were reviewed retrospectively. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and the potential contributions to the staging accuracy of the distinct area were analysed. The survival benefit of dissection was compared for pericolic (local), mesocolic (intermediate) and main arterial trunk (main) LN. Removal of the pericolic LNs within 5 cm of the tumour and intermediate LNs resulted in a mean LN number of 15.9, a sensitivity for overall node positivity of 97.5 per cent, and a survival benefit calculated as a therapeutic value index of 31.4 points. The additional removal of LNs more than 5 cm from the tumour and main LNs did not improve the staging accuracy, while adding only 3.4 points to the survival benefit. Current guidelines may encourage needlessly extensive surgery. Clinical trials to establish the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy are warranted.
Medical subject headings
- Colonic Neoplasms
- Lymph Node Excision