Randomized trial of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: impact on clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Abstract

Computer-assisted surgery in knee arthroplasty is gaining popularity; however, the resulting outcome improvement is controversial. A double-blinded trial was performed with subjects randomized to undergo surgery with either computer-assisted or nonassisted instruments. Postoperatively, limb and implant alignment and rotation were assessed using both full-length radiographs and computed tomography in addition to clinical scores. One hundred twenty patients (141 knees) were randomized. No differences in Western Ontario MacMaster Osteoarthritis Score, Short Form-36, or flexion were seen. More varus limb alignment was seen in the computer-assisted group (1.9°) vs the nonassisted group (0.9°, P = .04) with no improvement in alignment precision. Rotational alignment of the components did not differ between groups. Computer-assisted surgery appeared to have minimal effect on knee implant arthroplasty with no improvement in limb alignment or early functional outcome.