The ethics of pacemaker deactivation in terminally ill patients.
case_report · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21621131.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.03.003.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A core principle of American medical ethics holds that an informed and capacitated patient has the right to have treatments withdrawn or withheld. Nevertheless, many clinicians remain reluctant to honor a request to deactivate a patient's pacemaker. This article describes a case in which a patient was denied her request for pacemaker deactivation. Several reasons for this reluctance are discussed, including historical, practical, and ethical considerations for opposing pacemaker deactivation. Ultimately, however, from an ethical standpoint, pacemaker deactivation is similar to withdrawal of other therapies. Fortunately, a recent expert consensus statement supports a patient's right to have her pacemaker deactivated. Pacemaker deactivation should only be performed after robust informed consent, which must include discussion of risks, benefits, and all viable alternatives based on the patient's values and goals.
Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
- Pacemaker, Artificial
- Terminally Ill
- Treatment Refusal
- Withholding Treatment