Laparoscopic fellowship training can deliver a competent laparoscopic surgeon and trainer.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21689333.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02653.x.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The study investigated whether experience gained during a UK laparoscopic colorectal fellowship enabled the fellow subsequently to train consultant colleagues in laparoscopic surgery. In one unit a newly appointed post-laparoscopic fellowship consultant (PFC) mentored his other two colleagues. Prospectively collected data regarding surgical outcome were compared with those of the year preceding the PFC appointment. In the preceding year 18.5% of 260 resections were attempted laparoscopically. This increased to 92.6% (of 270) in the year after (P < 0.0001). Respective conversion rates were 4.2% and 8.4% (P = 0.5524). In the first 6 months after PFC appointment, mentored consultants performed 23 supervised cases. In the second 6 months they carried out 58 procedures independently and trainees performed 38 supervised cases. There was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage and readmission and 30-day mortality rates between the pre- and post-PFC periods. A laparoscopic fellowship enables the PFC to mentor consultant colleagues safely and effectively.
Medical subject headings
- Clinical Competence
- Colorectal Surgery
- Education, Medical, Continuing
- Fellowships and Scholarships
- Laparoscopy
- Mentors