Prospective randomized comparison of high-flex and standard rotating platform total knee arthroplasty.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21723697.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.045.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We sought to determine if the rotating platform (RP) high-flex design provides improved flexion compared with the standard RP total knee. A total of 142 patients were randomized to receive an RP flex (RP-F) or RP TKA. Supine flexion was measured with a goniometer and lateral x-ray. There was no difference in flexion measured at any interval between groups (1-year clinical flexion RP, 124.0°; RP-F, 124.2°; P = .949; 1-year x-ray flexion RP, 117.9°; RP-F, 117.6°; P = .985). There was no difference between groups comparing the improvement from preoperative to 1-year postoperative flexion (RP-F, 5.2°; RP, 4.1°; P = .580). There were 13 patients with postoperative patellar crepitus, with more in the RP-F group (RP-F, 11 patients [16.7%]; RP, 2 patients [3.2%]; P = .017). Owing to these results, coupled with the increased bone resection and higher cost, we no longer routinely use the RP-F design.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Knee Prosthesis
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Prosthesis Design
Anatomy
- knee