Bone graft substitutes in active or suspected infection. Contra-indicated or not?
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21762911.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.189.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Treatment of infection in clinical orthopaedic and trauma care is a time consuming and costly endeavour. More than once, it will lead to extraction of implant material and additional surgical interventions. Currently, debridement, implantation of PMMA beads impregnated with antibiotics most often with implant exchange are the gold standard for deep infection treatment. Recently bone graft substitute materials such as calcium phosphate, collagen fleeces and bioglasses have appeared for specific use in infection treatment. Although these materials show great potential, their supporting level of evidence is still limited. This review paper provides an overview of current understanding and therapies for infection treatment and provides concepts for the use of new developed biomaterials in infection treatment. Furthermore, the benefits and risks of using biomaterials in infection treatment are discussed and the level of evidence of a number of new materials is presented.
Medical subject headings
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Bone Cements
- Bone Substitutes
- Polymethyl Methacrylate
- Prosthesis-Related Infections