The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21816732.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmj.d4521 and PMC identifier 3150633.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To estimate the risks and benefits to health of travel by bicycle, using a bicycle sharing scheme, compared with travel by car in an urban environment. Health impact assessment study. Public bicycle sharing initiative, Bicing, in Barcelona, Spain. 181,982 Bicing subscribers. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome measure was all cause mortality for the three domains of physical activity, air pollution (exposure to particulate matter <2.5 µm), and road traffic incidents. The secondary outcome was change in levels of carbon dioxide emissions. Compared with car users the estimated annual change in mortality of the Barcelona residents using Bicing (n = 181,982) was 0.03 deaths from road traffic incidents and 0.13 deaths from air pollution. As a result of physical activity, 12.46 deaths were avoided (benefit:risk ratio 77). The annual number of deaths avoided was 12.28. As a result of journeys by Bicing, annual carbon dioxide emissions were reduced by an estimated 9,062,344 kg. Public bicycle sharing initiatives such as Bicing in Barcelona have greater benefits than risks to health and reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
Medical subject headings
- Accidents, Traffic
- Automobile Driving
- Bicycling
- Environmental Exposure
- Exercise