Cervical length at 30-32 weeks and the risk of Cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21845743.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/uog.10069.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To estimate the association between the cervical length (CL) measurement at 30-32 weeks and the mode of delivery in twin pregnancies. This was a retrospective study of a cohort, from 2005-2010, of 265 twin pregnancies with a CL measurement at 30-32 weeks. We compared the CL measurement at 30-32 weeks based on mode of delivery. We then analyzed our data across four subgroups, based on the CL measurement quartiles at 30-32 weeks. We performed this analysis in all patients, and also performed a planned subgroup analysis of 130 patients who attempted a vaginal delivery. In all patients, including those who attempted a vaginal delivery, the mean CL at 30-32 weeks was significantly shorter in women who delivered vaginally compared with women who had a Cesarean section. The likelihood of Cesarean delivery increased significantly with increasing CL measurement across the groups defined by measurement quartiles. On adjusted analysis controlling for maternal age, race, in-vitro fertilization, chorionicity, induction of labor and prior vaginal delivery, the CL measurement at 30-32 weeks was independently associated with mode of delivery. In twin pregnancies, the CL at 30-32 weeks is significantly associated with the likelihood of Cesarean delivery. A longer CL may represent underdevelopment of the uterus, leading to a higher risk of Cesarean delivery in labor at term.
Medical subject headings
- Cervical Length Measurement
- Cervix Uteri
- Cesarean Section
- Delivery, Obstetric
- Labor, Induced
- Pregnancy, Twin