Patterns of osseointegration and remodeling in femoral revision with bone loss using modular, tapered, fluted, titanium stems.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21855273.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.021.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Radiographic signs of osseointegration with the use of fluted, tapered, modular, titanium stems in revision hip arthroplasty with bone loss have not been previously categorized. Serial radiographs of 64 consecutive hips with mean follow-up of 6.2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Bone loss was classified as per Paprosky classification, osseointegration was assessed according to a modified system of Engh et al, and Harris Hip Score was used to document pain and function. Seventy-four percent of the hips had type 3 or 4 bone loss. All stems were radiographically osseointegrated. Early minor subsidence was seen in 6.2% of the hips; definite bony regeneration, 73% of the hips; and stress shielding, 26% of the hips. These osseointegration patterns were different from those described for extensively porous-coated cobalt-chromium stems and had a bearing on the evaluation of fixation of these stems.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Bone Remodeling
- Bone Resorption
- Femur
- Hip Prosthesis
- Osseointegration
- Prosthesis Design
- Titanium
Anatomy
- femur
- hip