Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21889142.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.199.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Autologous bone is used very often in the treatment of fresh fractures, delayed unions and non-unions. Alternatives have included allografts and in recent years also demineralized bone matrix. The growing availability of good synthetic bone grafts and their advantages in safety and avoiding donor-site morbidity are the reasons that these products are being used more and more. There are on the market a wide variety of substitutes with different capabilities. Nevertheless autologous bone graft is still considered as the gold standard and will be discussed here in that context. Osteoconductive, osteogenic and osteoinductive products will also be classified and their advantages and disadvantages described.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Cements
- Bone Matrix
- Bone Substitutes
- Bone Transplantation
- Transplantation, Homologous