Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21924397.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.032.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We sought to determine the effect of nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum during cesarean section on the formation of adhesions. This was a prospective randomized trial of 533 women undergoing primary cesarean section; in 256 the peritoneum was left open and in 277 it was closed. Fifty women in the nonclosure group and 47 women in the closure group were subsequently evaluated intraoperatively at a repeat cesarean. The presence of adhesions and their severity were evaluated at several sites. The nonclosure and closure groups were comparable with regard to the proportion of patients with adhesions at any site (60% vs 51%, respectively; P = .31). Time from incision to delivery was comparable in the nonclosure and closure groups (8.98 ± 4.7 vs 9.32 ± 5.2 minutes, respectively; P = .84). Closure or nonclosure of the peritoneum at cesarean section did not lead to large differences in the adhesion rate.
Medical subject headings
- Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques
- Cesarean Section
- Peritoneum
- Tissue Adhesions