Anti-EGFR-targeting agents in recurrent or metastatic head and neck carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21953841.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/hed.21858.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies are effective in head and neck carcinoma. A meta-analysis was performed to assess their efficacy and safety in advanced head and neck carcinoma. Six trials randomizing 2257 patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck carcinoma for chemotherapy or best supportive care with or without anti-EGFR therapies were identified. The efficacy data included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity. The response rate was higher in the experimental arm (p < .0001; relative risk = 1.62). A significant PFS benefit (p < .0001; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70) favored the anti-EGFR treatment. Survival was significantly increased if trials of monoclonal antibodies were included (p = .004; HR = 0.83). A higher incidence of diarrhea, skin rash, anorexia, and hypomagnesemia was observed. This meta-analysis suggests that in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer the addition of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies to standard therapy confers a statistically significant improvement in OS, PFS, and overall response rate.
Medical subject headings
- Antibodies, Monoclonal
- ErbB Receptors
- Head and Neck Neoplasms