Debate: whether abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery should be centralized at higher-volume centers.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21971095.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.064.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Volume-outcome relationships in vascular surgery have become increasingly relevant in recent years. At the individual surgeon level, increased experience has been linked with improved patient outcomes after volume-outcome and learning curve analyses. At the hospital level, further analyses have generally shown a similar relationship linking the busier hospitals with improved outcomes. However, is this relationship sufficient and robust enough to support important health care delivery decisions regarding centralization of care? In England, such information has helped to shape the vascular surgery reorganization process in London. The following discussion presents the advantages and disadvantages of the practical use of such information.
Medical subject headings
- Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
- Centralized Hospital Services
- Endovascular Procedures
- Hospitals
- Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
- Regional Health Planning
- Vascular Surgical Procedures