Anatomical variations of hepatic veins: three-dimensional computed tomography scans of 200 subjects.

Fang, Chi-Hua; You, Jin-Hua; Lau, Wan Yee; Lai, Eric C H; Fan, Ying-Fang; Zhong, Shi-Zhen; Li, Ke-Xiao; Chen, Zhi-Xiang et al. · World J Surg · 2012

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

The impact of hepatic venous anatomic variations on hepatic resection and transplantation is the least understood aspect of liver surgery. A prospective three-dimensional computed tomography study was undertaken on 200 consecutive subjects with normal livers to determine the prevalence of surgically significant hepatic venous anatomic variations. The prevailing pattern of the three hepatic veins in these subjects was a right hepatic vein (RHV) and a common trunk for the middle (MHV) and left (LHV) hepatic veins (122/200, 61%). The remaining patients had the RHV, MHV, and LHV draining independently into the inferior vena cava (IVC). In 39% of patients, the RHV was small and was compensated by a large right inferior hepatic vein (21.0%), an accessory RHV (8.5%) or a well-developed MHV (6.5%). A segment 4 vein was seen in 51.5% of patients. This segment 4 vein joined the LHV (26%), the MHV (17.5%), or the IVC (8%). An umbilical vein and a segment 4 vein were seen in 3.5% of patients. These two veins joined either the LHV (2.0%) or the MHV (1.5%). Knowing the variations of hepatic veins before surgery is useful during both partial hepatectomy and donor operations for living related liver transplantation.

Medical subject headings