Carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck: comparison between positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 21990221.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/hed.21635.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Comparison of the diagnostic validity of positron emission tomography (PET) alone with integrated PET and CT (PET/CT) in the search for occult primary tumors in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) site in the head and neck. Thirty-nine consecutive patients with clinical CUP were investigated with PET and 38 patients with PET/CT. After initial diagnostic panendoscopy and histological confirmation of the cervical lymph node metastasis, either PET or PET/CT scanning was performed. Integrated PET/CT had a significantly higher overall detection rate than dedicated PET alone (55.2% vs 30.8%; p = .039) and positive prediction rate (93.3% vs 46.1%; p = .01). Integrated PET/CT showed to be superior to PET in the detection of the primary site of clinically occult tumors in CUP syndrome. However, a negative result should still be investigated further by means of panendoscopy with tonsillectomy and blind biopsies.
Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Neoplasms, Unknown Primary
- Positron-Emission Tomography
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed