Patients lost to follow-up after metacarpal fractures.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22015075.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.08.003.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine factors associated with non-attendance at scheduled follow-up visits for treatment of metacarpal fractures, to improve subject retention in prospective investigations. This study included adult patients with metacarpal fractures seen in an outpatient hand clinic between 2004 and 2009. We assessed a number of variables (demographic, social, and injury-specific) that might be associated with failure to return for follow-up. The statistical analysis included both bivariate and multivariable models. In a cohort of 335 patients (228 men and 107 women) with a mean age of 40 years (range, 18-88 y), independent factors associated with non-attendance were unmarried status (single or divorced), having no insurance, having an unemployed or disabled status, having an unknown work status, and having a small finger metacarpal neck fracture. Patients who do not attend a scheduled 1-month follow-up after a single isolated metacarpal fracture are sociologically distinct from those who do attend. Prognostic IV.
Medical subject headings
- Fractures, Bone
- Hand Injuries
- Lost to Follow-Up
- Metacarpal Bones
- Patient Compliance
Anatomy
- hand