Compliance to service standards for congenital upper limb deficiency: the Northern Ireland experience.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22072190.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/0309364611427070.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In 2003, the British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine (BSRM) published guidelines on amputee and prosthetic rehabilitation, including those with congenital limb deficiency. The aim of the study was to evaluate the service provided by the Regional Disablement Service (RDS) to children with congenital upper limb deficiency, against BSRM guidelines. Retrospective chart review. Chart review. Analysis of the group (n = 44) showed 52% were male, with 61% of children affected on the left side, and 73% having a transverse deficiency. Compliance to individual aspects of the guidelines varied considerably. Only 14 (32%) of children had met with the multidisciplinary team by the recommended age of six months. Analysis of referral sources and timings suggested that children were initially seen elsewhere and later referred to RDS after consultation with a surgeon. RDS compliance with the BSRM guidelines was variable. Particularly disappointing was the low rate of children and families meeting the multidisciplinary team at an early age (< 6 months). The low rate of early referral prompted us to contact all paediatricians in Northern Ireland highlighting the guidelines, the benefits of early contact with RDS and encouraging referral on diagnosis.
Medical subject headings
- Amputees
- Artificial Limbs
- Child Health Services
- Guideline Adherence
- Limb Deformities, Congenital
- Practice Guidelines as Topic