Fast Track THR: One Hospital's Experience with a 2-Day Length of Stay Protocol for Total Hip Replacement.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22084624.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s11420-011-9207-2 and PMC identifier 3192891.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Current trends in total joint replacement have focused on shorter hospital stays. This study aimed to determine if a pathway for total hip replacement (THR) with the goal of a 2-day discharge (fast track) is safe and effective compared to our traditional pathway (control). One hundred forty-nine patients undergoing unilateral, uncomplicated, THR were enrolled in an accelerated postoperative pathway and 134 were enrolled in the traditional pathway. Patients were followed prospectively and outcomes included hospital length of stay, intra- and postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations. A statistical model was created to determine factors predictive of a 2-day discharge. At 1 year, there were no differences in complications, readmissions, or reoperations. The average length of stay decreased from 4.1 to 2.6 days (p < 0.0001). In the fast track group, 58% of patients were discharged home within 2 days. Barriers to a 2-day discharge were postoperative pain, nausea, and dizziness. The only preoperative factor that was predictive of a 2-day discharge was hypertension. In a select group of patients, a protocol that allows for a 2-day discharge following THR is safe and effective.
Anatomy
- hip