Ergonomic port placement in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
other
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22107130.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02894.x.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Port placement in laparoscopic surgery has important ergonomic implications. A manipulation angle (MA) of 60° has been shown to maximize task efficiency. We calculated the MA used during various stages of both right hemicolectomy (RH) and high anterior resection (AR). We compared two methods of port placement for each operation. RH-PP1 included ports in the left iliac fossa and left upper quadrant. RH-PP2 included ports suprapubically and in the left iliac fossa. We calculated the MA of each of these methods in mobilizing both the caecum and hepatic flexure. AR-PP1 included ports in the right iliac fossa and right upper quadrant. AR-PP2 included ports suprapubically and in the right iliac fossa. We calculated the MA of each of these methods in mobilizing the splenic flexure, descending-sigmoid junction and the recto-sigmoid junction. For RH-PP1, the mean MA for mobilizing the caecum and hepatic flexure was 38° and 52°, respectively. For RH-PP2, the mean MA for mobilising the caecum and hepatic flexure was 58° and 44°, respectively. For AR-PP1, the mean MA for mobilizing the splenic flexure, the descending-sigmoid junction and the recto-sigmoid junction was 77°, 41° and 18°, respectively. For AR-PP2, the mean MA for mobilizing the splenic flexure, the descending-sigmoid junction and the recto-sigmoid junction was 40°, 56° and 34°, respectively. There are no two port placements that will allow for an ideal MA at every stage of mobilization for either right- or left-sided resection.
Medical subject headings
- Colectomy
- Ergonomics
- Laparoscopy