Radiological evaluation of intertrochanteric fracture fixation by the proximal femoral nail.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22134114.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.030.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Successful treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures was reportedly influenced by the position of the fixation devices, by reduction quality and by fracture type. The records of 227 patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary hip screws were analysed retrospectively. The angle and distance from the femur head apex were transformed into Cartesian coordinates. Comparisons were performed between patients with no mechanical failure (207 patients, 90.7%), with cutouts (15 patients, 6.6%) and with secondary loss of reduction (5 patients, 2.2%). The standard tip apex distance (TAD) measurement above 25 mm did not predict failure (p=0.62). Mechanical failure rates increased from 4.8% to 34.4% when the centre of lag screw was not in the second quarter of the head-neck interface line (the so-called "safe zone") (p=0.001). Lag screw insertion lower or higher than 11 mm of the head apex line were associated with failure rates of 5.5% and 18.6%, respectively (p=0.004). Multivariate logistic regression showed that lag screw insertion not within the "safe-zone" was associated an Odds Ratio of 13.4 (95% CI 2.24-81) for mechanical failure (p=0.004). The TAD scale focuses on length measurement and lacks the vector properties of multidirectional measurements. Vector analysis revealed that the caudal-cranial correct lag screw position is the most important factor in preventing mechanical failure.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Nails
- Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary
- Hip Fractures
- Osteoporosis
- Postoperative Complications
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed