Repeat 2-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a viable option?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22226613.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.006.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We investigated whether performing a repeat 2-stage exchange eradicates infection in patients who previously underwent 2-stage treatment for an infected total hip arthroplasty. We identified 15 patients who had failed a 2-stage total hip arthroplasty and underwent a planned repeat 2-stage between 2000 and 2009. Of the 15 patients, 8 were treated with a complete 2-stage procedure, whereas the remaining 7 patients were treated only with a first-stage resection of the infected implant. Of the 8 patients who underwent complete 2-stage exchange, 1 died because of in-hospital complications, and 1 had a recurrent infection. Repeat infection is highly associated with resistant organisms, obesity, and poor patient health. Of the 7 patients who underwent resection without reimplantation, 3 had a recurrent infection. Our data suggest that if infection can be adequately controlled after repeat resection of the joint prosthesis, reimplantation is a reasonable option.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Joint
- Prosthesis-Related Infections
Anatomy
- hip