A comparative study of uncemented tibial components.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 2230821.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The effect of tibial component stem and post design on load distribution and on displacements at the component-bone interface was investigated. Four different configurations were tested with a flat component used as a control. Loading conditions included vertical central, vertical offset (eg, varus/valgus), shear and torque. Both artificial and cadaveric bones were used in the study. Pressure-sensitive film was used to obtain pressure patterns at the interface. Image processing was then used to quantify the load distribution. For shear and torque, relative motion was seen as a smeared pressure pattern. This was calibrated in terms of microns of displacement as a function of image density. The central stemmed and bladed designs performed better than short-pegged designs, in resistance to offset loading. In shear and torque, short pegs close to the component periphery, or a central stem with blades, produced the least interface displacement. The application of this work to the design of components for both press-fit and cemented application is discussed.
Medical subject headings
- Cementation
- Knee Prosthesis
- Tibia
Anatomy
- knee
- tibia