Systematic review of the role of a belly board device in radiotherapy delivery in patients with pelvic malignancies.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22364650.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.02.004.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This review analyses the literature concerning the influence of the patient position (supine, prone and prone on a belly board device (BB) on the irradiated small-bowel-volume (SB-V)) and the resulting morbidity of radiation therapy (RT) in pelvic malignancies. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, web of science and Scopus. Forty-six full papers were found, of which 33 met the eligibility criteria. Fifteen articles focussed on the irradiated SB-V using dose volume histograms (DVHs). Twenty-seven articles studied the patient setup in different patient positions. This review showed that a prone treatment position can result in a lower irradiated SB-V as compared to a supine position, but a more significant reduction of the SB-V can be reached by the additional use of a BB in prone position, for both 3D-CRT and IMRT treatment plans. This reduction of the irradiated SB-V might result in a reduced GI-morbidity. The patient position did not influence the required PTV margins for prostate and rectum. The irradiated SB-V can be maximally reduced by the use of a prone treatment position combined with a BB for both 3D-CRT and IMRT, which might individually result in a reduction of GI-morbidity.
Medical subject headings
- Pelvic Neoplasms
- Prone Position
- Radiotherapy, Conformal
- Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
- Supine Position