IOM committee members respond to Endocrine Society vitamin D guideline.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22442278.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1210/jc.2011-2218 and PMC identifier 5393439.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In early 2011, a committee convened by the Institute of Medicine issued a report on the Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium and vitamin D. The Endocrine Society Task Force in July 2011 published a guideline for the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency. Although these reports are intended for different purposes, the disagreements concerning the nature of the available data and the resulting conclusions have caused confusion for clinicians, researchers, and the public. In this commentary, members of the Institute of Medicine committee respond to aspects of The Endocrine Society guideline that are not well supported and in need of reconsideration. These concerns focus on target serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, the definition of vitamin D deficiency, and the question of who constitutes a population at risk vs. the general population.
Medical subject headings
- Health Promotion
- Nutritional Requirements
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Vitamin D
- Vitamin D Deficiency