What's next? Alternative materials for articulation in total joint replacement.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22446959.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.029.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The use of an artificial joint is always related to a certain amount of wear. Its biological effects, e.g., the osteolysis potential, are a function of the bulk material as well as its debris. Following comprehensive experiences with polyethylene (PE) wear, material science is tracking two ways to minimize the risk of a particle-induced aseptic implant loosening: (i) reduction of the PE debris by a low-wearing articulation partner; and (ii) replacement of the PE by other materials. Therefore, new ceramics (e.g., ZTA, Si(3)N(4)), as well as coatings (e.g., TiN, "diamond-like" carbon) and modifications of a bulk metal (e.g., oxidizes zirconium) or cushion bearings (polyurethane, hydrogels), are currently available for total joint replacements or have been used for pre-clinical testing. This review gives a brief overview and evaluates the potential of those that have recently been published in literature.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement
- Biocompatible Materials
- Joint Prosthesis
- Range of Motion, Articular