Selected common diagnostic problems in urologic pathology: perspectives from a large consult service in genitourinary pathology.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22458899.
- Also identified by DOI 10.5858/arpa.2011-0187-RA.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Several common differential diagnoses are encountered in urologic pathology, frequently causing patient referrals for a second opinion. To review 3 common differential diagnoses encountered in a large consultation service in genitourinary pathology, including partial atrophy versus prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma, oncocytoma versus chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma in situ versus normal urothelium and reactive atypia. We will discuss the detailed, morphologically distinctive features and the usefulness of immunohistochemistry. Personal experience and review of the current literature. Careful morphologic assessment and awareness of diagnostic pitfalls are fundamental in reaching a definitive diagnosis in most cases. Immunohistochemistry is useful but should be used only in conjunction with the morphologic impression.
Medical subject headings
- Adenoma, Oxyphilic
- Biomarkers, Tumor
- Carcinoma in Situ
- Carcinoma, Acinar Cell
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- Urogenital Neoplasms