Atlantoaxial fusion with screw-rod constructs: meta-analysis and review of literature.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22469526.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.03.013.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To review published series describing C1-2 posterior instrumented fusions and summarize clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with screw-rod constructs (SRC). Online databases were searched for English-language articles published between 1991 and April 2011 describing posterior atlantoaxial instrumentation with C1-2 SRC. There were 24 studies including 1073 patients treated with SRC that fulfilled inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis techniques were used to compare outcomes. All studies provided class III evidence. The 30-day perioperative mortality rate was 0.6%, and neurologic injury occurred in two patients with vertebral artery injury (VAI) from screw malpositions (0.2%). The incidence of clinically significant screw malpositions was 2.4% (confidence interval [CI], 1.1%-4.1%), the incidence of VAI was 2.0% (CI, 1.1%-3.4%), and the rate of fusion with the SRC technique was 97.5% (CI, 95.9%-98.5%). SRC is a safe and effective treatment option for C1-2 instability. The low but nonzero incidence of screw malposition and VAI emphasizes the necessity of having a thorough knowledge of atlantoaxial anatomy for successful insertion of screws.
Medical subject headings
- Atlanto-Axial Joint
- Joint Instability
- Spinal Fusion