Common myths and evidence in the management of distal radius fractures.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22554655.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.02.005 and PMC identifier 3345125.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common fracture treated by physicians, but questions remain regarding optimal management. Fracture patterns, biomechanics, and treatment strategies have been debated for more than 200 years, and research shows many controversies regarding long-held beliefs. Although these common myths have been propagated and considered fact, they are not based on the best-available evidence. This article illustrates some of the major controversies regarding the management of DRFs. To provide optimal care in a world of evidence-based medicine, clinicians must shift their thinking and accept that some of the indoctrinated ideas may represent a flawed heuristic approach.
Medical subject headings
- Radius Fractures
Anatomy
- radius