Sino-nasal characteristics in asthmatic patients.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22714421.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/0194599812451408.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The Unified Airways Hypothesis suggests an involvement of the upper airways in asthma. We aimed to evaluate the association between subjective sino-nasal complaints, nasal air flow, and sino-nasal quality of life (QOL) in patients with asthma compared with nonasthmatic subjects. Case-control study. A tertiary referral center. Symptoms, quality of life, and nasal airflow were assessed in 91 asthmatics and 95 nonasthmatic controls with Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-100), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20), and Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF), respectively. Asthma and allergy status were assessed by Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and skin prick test or specific IgE. Asthmatic patients (men/women, 37/54; mean age, 43.7 years; range, 19-64 years) reported significantly more nasal obstruction (mean VAS, 37 mm; SD = 26, 95% CI, 32-43 vs 9 mm, SD = 11, 95% CI, 7-11, P < .001) and lower sino-nasal quality of life (mean SNOT-20, 1.3; SD = 0.8, 95% CI, 1.1-1.5 vs 0.4, SD = 0.5, 95% CI, 0.3-0.5, P < .001) than controls (men/women, 42/53; mean age, 43.8 years; range, 20-65 years). PNIF was significantly lower in asthmatic patients than controls (mean PNIF, 84 l/min; SD = 24, 95% CI, 79-89 vs 100 l/min SD = 24, 95% CI, 95-105, P < .001). Both allergic and nonallergic asthma were associated with increased sino-nasal symptoms, reduced sino-nasal QOL, and reduced inspiratory nasal air flow compared to controls. This provides further evidence of the clinical importance of the upper airway in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of asthma patients beyond the scope of allergy.
Medical subject headings
- Asthma
- Nose Diseases