Three-field minimally invasive esophagectomy: current results and technique.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22743173.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.06.002.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The adoption of minimally invasive esophagectomy has increased worldwide since its first description more than 15 years ago. The technique has evolved from a transhiatal to a 3-hole McKeowan approach and, more recently, to a minimally invasive Ivor Lewis approach. We reviewed the technique and results of 3-hole minimally invasive esophagectomy. We favor thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization with the patient in a lateral decubitus position, although other groups have reported this with a prone or robotic approach. Several series have demonstrated low perioperative mortality with minimally invasive esophagectomy. A major advantage compared with esophagectomy with thoracotomy is a lower incidence of respiratory complications, which have been shown to be a significant predictor of mortality in other studies.
Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms
- Esophagectomy
- Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted