Estimating energy expenditure in mice using an energy balance technique.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22751256.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/ijo.2012.105 and PMC identifier 3697837.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare, in mice, the accuracy of estimates of energy expenditure (EE) using an energy balance technique (TEEbal: food energy intake and body composition change) vs indirect calorimetry (TEEIC). In 32 male C57BL/6J mice, EE was estimated using an energy balance (caloric intake minus change in body energy stores) method over a 37-day period. EE was also measured in the same animals by indirect calorimetry. These measures were compared. The two methods were highly correlated (r(2)=0.87: TEEbal=1.07*TEEIC-0.22, P<0.0001). By Bland-Altman analysis, TEEbal estimates were slightly higher (4.6±1.5%; P<0.05) than TEEIC estimates (Bias=0.55 kcal per 24 h). TEEbal can be performed in 'home cages' and provides an accurate integrated long-term measurement of EE while minimizing potentially confounding stress that may accompany the use of indirect calorimetry systems. The technique can also be used to assess long-term energy intake.
Medical subject headings
- Body Composition
- Body Weight
- Calorimetry, Indirect
- Energy Metabolism