Epidural catheter connectors: a laboratory-based comparison of the Portex Tuohy-Borst and EpiFuse™ designs.

Abstract

Disconnection of an epidural catheter from its connector may result in patient harm and commonly requires resiting of the epidural. Clamp-connector designs such as the novel Portex EpiFuse™ potentially offer an improved safety profile over screw-cap designs such as the Tuohy-Borst, but comparative studies are limited. We therefore compared the tensile strength of EpiFuse and Tuohy-Borst connectors in a laboratory setting. We further sought to establish whether operator modification of the EpiFuse increased its vulnerability to disconnection. The median (IQR [range]) force to induce disconnection was 8.0 (4.1-12.8 [0.0-22.6]) N for Tuohy-Borst connectors and 16.4 (15.2-17.7 [5.7-18.9]) and 15.9 (15.0-16.9 [5.8-18.1]) N for standard and modified EpiFuse connectors, respectively (p<0.0001). The Tuohy-Borst was also less likely to meet British Standard requirements (13/20 sets vs 19/20 and 20/20, p=0.002). Modification of the EpiFuse did not affect lumen patency or connection strength. We conclude that under controlled conditions, EpiFuse connectors are superior to Tuohy-Borst connectors.