Ethical issues in the design of randomized trials: to sham or not to sham.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22810439.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2106/JBJS.L.00298.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The placebo effect is based on the expectations of the patient regarding the effectiveness of the treatment. The high levels of stress and rituals involved with surgery can lead to a strong placebo effect. However, the ethical principles of performing sham surgery to measure any placebo effect have been questioned, and sham-controlled surgical trials are rarely conducted. While there are a number of ethical principles that must be considered to justify the implementation of a sham-controlled surgical clinical trial, four areas deserve particular attention: equipoise, risk minimization, informed consent, and deception. Particularly in orthopaedics, where equipoise is common, sham-controlled trials may be important to ensure that inferior or ineffective treatments do not become standard practice.
Medical subject headings
- Orthopedic Procedures
- Placebos
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic