Interpretation and communication of medical evidence: room for improvement.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22914477.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265f377.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Obstetricians often rely on the results of randomized studies and other medical evidence to guide them in treating patients. However, not infrequently, there are problems with the manner in which we communicate medical evidence to our patients and the public. For instance, we often rely almost exclusively on relative risks without discussing absolute risks. This has the potential to cause undue anxiety, misinterpretation, unrealistic expectations, and problems with clinical decision making. This commentary encourages a more critical look at the way we interpret data and communicate medical evidence to our patients and the public.
Medical subject headings
- Communication
- Directive Counseling
- Obstetrics
- Patient Education as Topic
- Physician-Patient Relations