No third-party punishment in chimpanzees.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22927412.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1073/pnas.1203179109 and PMC identifier 3443148.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Punishment can help maintain cooperation by deterring free-riding and cheating. Of particular importance in large-scale human societies is third-party punishment in which individuals punish a transgressor or norm violator even when they themselves are not affected. Nonhuman primates and other animals aggress against conspecifics with some regularity, but it is unclear whether this is ever aimed at punishing others for noncooperation, and whether third-party punishment occurs at all. Here we report an experimental study in which one of humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), could punish an individual who stole food. Dominants retaliated when their own food was stolen, but they did not punish when the food of third-parties was stolen, even when the victim was related to them. Third-party punishment as a means of enforcing cooperation, as humans do, might therefore be a derived trait in the human lineage.
Medical subject headings
- Animals, Zoo
- Behavior, Animal
- Biological Evolution
- Pan troglodytes
- Punishment
- Social Behavior