Comparison of tibial bone coverage of 6 knee prostheses: a magnetic resonance imaging study with controlled rotation.

Wernecke, Gregory C; Harris, Ian A; Houang, Michael T W; Seeto, Bradley G; Chen, Darren B; MacDessi, Samuel J · J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) · 2012

cross_sectional · Level IV

Where this comes from

Abstract

To compare the extent of tibial bone covered by the tibial tray in 6 most commonly used total knee arthroplasty designs in order to strike a balance between mediolateral cortical fit and optimal tibial component rotation. In 74 men and 27 women aged 17 to 60 (mean, 32) years with suspected soft-tissue injuries, their magnetic resonance images of the knee in full extension were superimposed with scans of the tibial trays of the 6 designs (one asymmetric and 5 symmetric). The tibial coverage by the tray and any posterolateral/posteromedial overhang/underhang were measured. All 6 tray designs achieved tibial bone coverage of over 80%. Only 28% of all trays achieved optimal posterolateral fit, whereas 49% had posterolateral overhang enough to cause popliteal tendon impingement. Although the asymmetric tray provided highest tibial coverage (88%), its rates of relative and absolute posterolateral and posteromedial overhang were also highest (64%). The asymmetric tray provided improved tibial coverage at the expense of posterolateral and posteromedial overhang of the tibial tray.

Medical subject headings

Anatomy