Comparing clustering and pre-processing in taxonomy analysis.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22962346.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts552.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Massively parallel sequencing allows for rapid sequencing of large numbers of sequences in just a single run. Thus, 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) amplicon sequencing of complex microbial communities has become possible. The sequenced 16S rRNA fragments (reads) are clustered into operational taxonomic units and taxonomic categories are assigned. Recent reports suggest that data pre-processing should be performed before clustering. We assessed combinations of data pre-processing steps and clustering algorithms on cluster accuracy for oral microbial sequence data. The number of clusters varied up to two orders of magnitude depending on pre-processing. Pre-processing using both denoising and chimera checking resulted in a number of clusters that was closest to the number of species in the mock dataset (25 versus 15). Based on run time, purity and normalized mutual information, we could not identify a single best clustering algorithm. The differences in clustering accuracy among the algorithms after the same pre-processing were minor compared with the differences in accuracy among different pre-processing steps. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. bonder.m.j@gmail.com or b.brandt@acta.nl
Medical subject headings
- Algorithms
- Bacteria
- Cluster Analysis
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S