Accuracy of lower cervical pedicle screw placement with assistance of distinct navigation systems: a human cadaveric study.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 22987158.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00586-012-2494-6 and PMC identifier 3540299.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Evaluate the accuracy of five different techniques for lower cervical pedicle screw placement. Forty human cadaveric cervical spines were equally divided into five groups, and each group had eight specimens. Pedicle screws with dia. 3.5 mm were used. Group 1 was blind screw placement without any assistance; Group 2-5 was assisted by the X-ray fluoroscopy, virtual fluoroscopy navigation system, CT-based navigation system, and Iso-C 3D navigation system, respectively. Thereafter, cortical integrity of each pedicle was evaluated by anatomic dissection of the specimens. A total of 398 pedicle screws were inserted. In the Group 1-5, the average operation time per sample was 27 ± 3.0, 112 ± 10.3, 69 ± 6.4, 98 ± 11.0, and 91 ± 6.0 min, respectively. The outcome for excellent, fair and poor were 29 (36.3 %), 21 (26.2 %) and 30 (37.5 %) in Group 1; 35 (44.9 %), 29 (37.2 %) and 14 (17.9 %) in Group 2; 34 (42.5 %), 36 (45.0 %) and 10 (12.5 %) in Group 3; 70 (87.5 %), 10 (12.5 %) and 0 (0.0 %) in Group 4; 72 (90.0 %), 8 (10.0 %) and 0 (0.0 %) in Group 5. Blind screw placement was surely unsafe. Lower cervical pedicle screw placement assisted by the CT-based navigation system or the Iso-C 3D navigation system significantly improved the accuracy compared to the fluoroscopy assistance and the virtual fluoroscopy navigation assistance.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Screws
- Cervical Vertebrae
- Spinal Fusion
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted
Anatomy
- cervical spine