Early versus delayed endoscopic surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: prospective randomized study.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23022645.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.08.008.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare the effects of early versus delayed endoscopic surgery in patients with moderately severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The study included 100 patients with CTS. Investigations performed before surgery excluded secondary causes. Patients with moderately severe CTS (grade 3-4) were randomly assigned. Bland's neurophysiologic grading scale for CTS was used to assess the patients. Patients underwent an endoscopic carpal tunnel release using an indigenously designed instrument. Following a course of conservative treatment, surgical treatment was offered in two groups: early surgery (n = 51; <1 week after diagnosis) and delayed surgery as per the usual waiting list (n = 49; >6 months after diagnosis). Improvement in both groups was significant (P < 0.001). When both groups were compared, improvement was better for the early surgery group (P < 0.001; confidence interval 6.35-9.12). On the basis of this study, early endoscopic surgery is proposed in patients with moderately severe CTS.
Medical subject headings
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Early Medical Intervention
- Endoscopy