Predicting pseudoknotted structures across two RNA sequences.
other
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23044552.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts575 and PMC identifier 3516145.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Laboratory RNA structure determination is demanding and costly and thus, computational structure prediction is an important task. Single sequence methods for RNA secondary structure prediction are limited by the accuracy of the underlying folding model, if a structure is supported by a family of evolutionarily related sequences, one can be more confident that the prediction is accurate. RNA pseudoknots are functional elements, which have highly conserved structures. However, few comparative structure prediction methods can handle pseudoknots due to the computational complexity. A comparative pseudoknot prediction method called DotKnot-PW is introduced based on structural comparison of secondary structure elements and H-type pseudoknot candidates. DotKnot-PW outperforms other methods from the literature on a hand-curated test set of RNA structures with experimental support. DotKnot-PW and the RNA structure test set are available at the web site http://dotknot.csse.uwa.edu.au/pw. janaspe@csse.uwa.edu.au Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Medical subject headings
- RNA
- RNA Folding
- Sequence Analysis, RNA
- Software