Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes.

Cheng, Yvonne W; Kaimal, Anjali J; Snowden, Jonathan M; Nicholson, James M; Caughey, Aaron B · Am J Obstet Gynecol · 2012

retrospective_cohort · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

We sought to examine the association of labor induction and perinatal outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women with term, live births. Women who had induction at a given gestational age (eg, 39 weeks) were compared to delivery at a later gestation (eg, 40, 41, or 42 weeks). Compared to delivery at a later gestational age, those induced at 39 weeks had a lower risk of cesarean (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.91) and labor dystocia (aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94). Their neonates had lowered risk of having 5-minute Apgar <7 (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92), meconium aspiration syndrome (aOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.48), and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97). Similar findings were seen for women who were induced at 40 weeks compared to delivery later. Induction of labor in low-risk women at term is not associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery compared to delivery later.

Medical subject headings