Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23063017.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.019 and PMC identifier 3719847.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We sought to examine the association of labor induction and perinatal outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women with term, live births. Women who had induction at a given gestational age (eg, 39 weeks) were compared to delivery at a later gestation (eg, 40, 41, or 42 weeks). Compared to delivery at a later gestational age, those induced at 39 weeks had a lower risk of cesarean (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.91) and labor dystocia (aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94). Their neonates had lowered risk of having 5-minute Apgar <7 (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92), meconium aspiration syndrome (aOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.48), and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97). Similar findings were seen for women who were induced at 40 weeks compared to delivery later. Induction of labor in low-risk women at term is not associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery compared to delivery later.
Medical subject headings
- Gestational Age
- Labor, Induced
- Labor, Obstetric
- Pregnancy Outcome