Current status of epibulbar anti-glaucoma drainage devices in glaucoma surgery.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23094002.
- Also identified by DOI 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0659 and PMC identifier PMC2801844.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The term "glaucoma" covers a heterogeneous group of progressive optic neuropathies that are accompanied by characteristic visual-field defects. Primary open-angle glaucoma, the most common type, progresses insidiously and causes blindness if untreated. All current forms of treatment aim at lowering the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients whose IOP is elevated. The implantation of anti-glaucoma drainage systems is one of the available options for surgical treatment. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent literature retrieved by a selective search, including glaucoma treatment guidelines from Germany and abroad. RESULTS: A paradigm shift is currently underway regarding the indications for the implantation of anti-glaucoma drainage systems. Trabeculectomy (a "fistulating" operation in which the aqueous humor is led out of the eye under the conjunctiva) is still considered the surgical gold standard, but drainage systems have been implanted with increasing frequency in recent years. Studies have shown that these systems are more likely to be beneficial the earlier they are implanted in the course of the patient's disease. Five-year follow-up data from the randomized, multicenter Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study have now revealed that anti-glaucoma drainage systems are equivalent to trabeculectomy with respect to long-term IOP reduction, complication rates, and absolute and relative clinical success rates. CONCLUSION: Glaucoma is a major clinical and socio-economic problem whose surgical treatment increasingly involves the implantation of anti-glaucoma drainage systems.