Adhesions and meshes: synthetic versus bioprosthetic.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23096974.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182638d48.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Adhesions are common after intra-abdominal surgery and are associated with significant morbidity, including bowel obstruction, pain, and infertility. Abdominal wall reconstruction carries the risk of adhesion formation, notably to synthetic or bioprosthetic mesh. This article reviews the pathophysiology of adhesion formation, adhesion grading, and adhesions to synthetic and biologic mesh in vitro and clinically. Bioprosthetic mesh in vitro appears to elicit fewer lower-grade adhesions than synthetic mesh. However, direct comparisons in humans of adhesions with synthetic versus bioprosthetic mesh are lacking. Future studies are warranted to determine whether there are significant differences in clinical outcomes, especially regarding secondary complications from adhesions.
Medical subject headings
- Acellular Dermis
- Biocompatible Materials
- Hernia, Ventral
- Herniorrhaphy
- Surgical Mesh
- Tissue Adhesions