Acceptability of standing workstations in elementary schools: a pilot study.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23103223.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.014.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the acceptability of introducing standing workstations in elementary-school classrooms; and to quantify changes in children's time spent sitting, standing, and walking; step counts; sit-to-stand transitions; and musculoskeletal discomfort. METHODS: A controlled trial was conducted in two elementary schools in Auckland, New Zealand (March-May 2012). Participants were 30 third and fourth graders (n = 23 intervention, n = 7 control). Intervention classes received standing workstations; control class retained usual sitting desks. Children wore ActivPAL monitors over 7 days at baseline and during the fourth week of the intervention. RESULTS: Children spoke enthusiastically of the standing workstations. School staffs were supportive of the standing workstations because they offered "flexibility in learning". Overall, children in the intervention group sat less (intervention: 8.27 (1.45), mean (SD); control: 9.00 (0.80) h/day), stood longer (3.75 (0.88); 2.85 (0.30) h/day), and engaged in fewer transitions from sitting to standing (93 (17); 98 (26) counts) compared to the control group. Effect size ranged from small-large (-0.49; 95% confidence limits (0.64)%, 0.71; (0.48), -0.96; (0.54)% respectively). Results for time spent stepping and step counts were unclear. CONCLUSION: Standing workstations can be successfully integrated in classroom environments and appear to decrease overall sedentariness.
Medical subject headings
- Interior Design and Furnishings
- Posture
- Schools