Routine bimanual pelvic examinations: practices and beliefs of US obstetrician-gynecologists.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23159688.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.015 and PMC identifier 4350675.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Less-than-annual cervical cancer screening is now recommended for most US women, raising questions about the need for routine annual bimanual pelvic examinations. Little is known about clinicians' bimanual pelvic examination practices, their beliefs about its importance, or the reasoning underlying its performance in asymptomatic women. We conducted a nationwide survey of US obstetrician-gynecologists. Respondents (n = 521) reported their examination practices and beliefs based on vignettes for asymptomatic women across the lifespan. Nearly all obstetrician-gynecologists perform bimanual pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women across the lifespan, although it is viewed as less important for a newly sexually active 18-year-old. Reasons cited as very important included adherence to standard medical practices (45%), patient reassurance (49%), detection of ovarian cancer (47%), and identification of benign uterine (59%) and ovarian (54%) conditions. Obstetrician-gynecologists perform bimanual pelvic examinations in the vast majority of asymptomatic women, but the importance placed on the examinations and reasons for conducting them vary.
Medical subject headings
- Genital Diseases, Female
- Gynecological Examination
- Gynecology
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Obstetrics
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'