Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit?
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23211231.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs388 and PMC identifier 4051258.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic devices are increasing in prevalence. The post-implant follow-up is important for monitoring both device function and patient condition. However, practice is inconsistent. For example, ICD follow-up schedules vary from 3 monthly to yearly according to facility and physician preference and availability of resources. Recommended follow-up schedules impose significant burden. Importantly, no surveillance occurs between follow-up visits. In contrast, implantable devices with automatic remote monitoring capability provide a means for performing constant surveillance, with the ability to identify salient problems rapidly. Remote home monitoring reduces the volume of device clinic visits and provides early detection of patient and/or system problems.
Medical subject headings
- Defibrillators, Implantable
- Pacemaker, Artificial
- Telemedicine